"What I need? A wife, a kid and a house, where I and my wife feels good at work, with the capability of improving and to feel that the company is part of ourselves in a self-motivated way. To be together at house talking at the table for some time, going to walk together and also the little moments when you make something typical and different that makes your house also a part of you. Play games with everybody, it does not matter if the game is for more than 16 years, you will do that together with your kid, you will explain everything he wants to know. And the most important the feeling of love is allover, it is just too boring to only play games for less than 12 years or to get addicted to just one game, there is a world out there.
We will learn together or separetely, each one with a book or I will explain the science world to my kid, not be limited to the newton world, I could also teach him einstein relativistic theory. Biology, mathematic.. it is difficult to dissociate a walk from a science learning because everything is connected. And what is more pleasant than to know how everything works when you are in touch with it?
But I mean learning and not memorizing, I do not want to make him know how is 27 multiplied by 34, this our computer could do for us, not memorizing the history or some facts. No no... when you understand that the mind use the memory to store the main information you do not need to memorize, but just experiment and feel. Learning is not studying for the exam, but is learn to skateboard, to understand how the newton world works... but people seem to misunderstand these things, but it have its consequences. Several consequences indeed, because since they do not feel, they also do not have any pleasure with it and then they think science does not make pleasure. Not to talk about how these people have lost their curiosity, how the way that they learned also guided to a live with more limitations because they think somebody needs to do something they do not want to achieve something. And how they got annoyed by the fact that everything is so pleasant for the ones that feel it."
"With all these feeling inside people, like a obligation feeling, a need for pleasure feeling and it all when it seems they did not have anything when they could have indeed. Sometimes people do not seem to live, but to follow strict rules, even a program could be more impredictable. I do think life is to explore, is to feel, to touch, to smell and mostly to think. Think in a way you are not limited by anything, in a way that you live the curiosity and let it drives and inhibit the things you find unpleasant or something you would not like to think... why? Because everytime we do not think about something that we never had before for some reason it just get deeps in our mind and it becomes our fear, our trauma or something that will really driven our behavior and limits our experimentation of life. Preferences is always good because we do not have the time to experiment everything.
I feel sad when I see someone that could not think about something and in my point of view this something could extend his/her pleasure or experience, just like someone that like plants and dislike to learn new things, when the bonsai could be a great experience for him/her."
"Reading the news today, on slashdot of course, I realize something I did not before. I have always thought of the culture as something people develop, but it seems now more complicated than that. Because if some politicians or market expand an idea (meme) it is stronger and could influence the population building up the culture. And it goes deeper, because the politicians are guided by money and the industries that give to them more money could get more culture on their side. Putting it simple organization of games give money to the politicians that help them. (that does not means that I not like games. I really like games and do think that games are good and nice but that depends on the game, as it depends on the book also... but the point here is that culture is just political not logical... I am one more time surprised to see one more way to think... darwinism, logic, political... what will I notice next? :) )"
"Education is definitely about intriguing and less about knowledge. I do not think it is a government's issue. It is ours, every family and every school. But how to solve it? Educating is rather tricky, no matter what you know, because it is how you feel that matters. You could not agree with me about that and I am sure I myself will not also at first glance, but when you compare different teachers from the same knowledge, practice and will, you will notice that no matter how much you know about pedagogy if you do not have the correct feeling at the correct time. Someone could say to me that pretending a feeling would be the same, well do not underestimate your children. And do not be angry with me if they start pretending feelings on you, they've learned what you taught."
"In the trade off between our logic and a semi-ideal society (just like the ant colony).
Human society has build up an empire based on his logic but inside of it, strong individual force flame. It is easily understandable as evolution for itself act on the genes and the degree of kinship work against a existence of a semi-ideal society, although by using logic the humans build what the birds and most of other social intelligent animals build, a logical society. But there are two forces in the game, one of them is the neo-darwinism and the other is the life-play. By neo-dawinism there is strong pressure for a human to be more individualist, but in the logic of a life-play, humans just like birds, lions, buffaloes and a lot others have some advantages in living together. Specially in the human society where the language and culture is so developed. But no logic will ever eliminate the neo-darwinism rule, and as human being we will always have a fight inside."
"People are always trying to be right and the mistakes is something that should never happen. Well it depends on the case, but normally I do not mind making mistakes, since I could try again and again and be probabilistically better each time in a optimization problem"
"Why I do not write something about artificial intelligence here? Some ideias or the like... well such ideias, even my greatest ones are nothing without a real algorithm doing things. I could not understand why people try to use words when you can touch, see and hear things. Words are valuable, but have you thought why do people prefer to watch films? It is not because it is better, it is because it is easier. I do not want to complicate things here, and therefore will discuss artificial intelligence executing an algorithm and not a bunch of ASCII code."
"Normally in a society the rules match what almost 70% of the citizens do and not do, but the rules are means to be static and stable, it was not a big deal till now because most of the societys changes are slow as well, but what if technology just broke some barriers and someone could as easy as possible read some brains? And if it was so disseminated and easy to obtain? Is it really wrong? Or our society is not well structured to change rules in such a pace. Or even more, since the structure changes cause damage and the bigger the structure the bigger the stability it normally needs to keep itself up, are any structures able to support such technology pace? Are our pace of technology wrong or just the focus? Are the humanity too much about intern issues and forgetting some major ones? Or are we just humans and as ants could not think in colony's issues? Maybe but the internet bring brains together and people are beginning to get connected with people and getting the information from the people and not from the theater of news guided by a mass market."
"Why are you so worried? You will die soon. Take the time and learn from itself do what makes your existence glow and taste life. It is not about winning or losing but playing the game because it is the the process that matter and not their result."
"Why are the people eating words? Arent we human beings supposed to connect and understand the world? It is disappointing to see people imitating others, just because the people learn that by imitating the rulers they receive good feedback. Teachers say and students repeat. Great scientists say and others repeat. Sometimes it is difficult to see farmers just doing what they should when you are a farmer by option. Farmer by option is when in the eyes of the farmer, the farm is a paradise, the animals are sons, the plants are your own blood, the terrain is your bed and you do the work till you got exhausted, you sleep doing the work, wake up happy to do the work, eat the breakfast thinking in the work, and do and feel the work as a child with a new toy. I am scientist by option."
"Walking around in the AI websites I found some discussion about free will and destiny, it is been already 5 years since I have concluded this subject and I do not have any doubt about our lack of free will. Although the sucessfull persons would like to believe in free will and the unsuccessull ones would like to not believe in it (this is because our mind concludes that not capable of free will we are not responsible for what we do, but it is just one other mind pun, that is as difficult as to understand free will), but I did not want an easy answer but one that seems natural and real. The physic reason is that all atoms reaction could be predicted in a live being and thus it is real easy to see that no such thing as free will take place. All could be predicted, not that we have now the power to do that, but we do this in a way simpler by using the behavior patterns something that is not so deep as atoms but predict very strong our simple actions human beings. I think we are all like stones, statics but in a high layer, just like a river that seems comples for a stone but the pattern is understandable. But the physic reason is obvious the most easy to understand and believe. But then the destiny exists? Well destiny is a paradox, that remain still today because it is not so easy to understand it. Think of the prediction of all atoms of the universe. Well this should be our destiny, but if something is predicting our future wouldnt it also affects our future? And if it is also predicting our future, it should predict the interferences of itself in the world and more than this, the predictions should be done in really small errors, because the years could lead to a increase in the error. But it is impossible to use a small part of the information to code all the information itself without leaving gaps, maybe we could use the universe to predict our next hour, but not more than this (I didnt also said anything about the time of the computation, which would make it more improbable, just like some very know undecidable problems like the halting problem)."
"Why people can not still understand that great scientists do not work in the books and papers but in the waves of the clouds? A surfer is trying to prove a theory of everything and everybody is astonished. Just like persisting in the errors, we follow without even knowing what and where we are going. Not because we do not have capacity to think, but we are too much busy to think"
"Try to forbid a child from something you will notice that he/she will probably begin hiding things from you and in some cases will do the forbid thing without you noticing. Try the next time to explain why you would rather not like that your child make it and focus on the end results. If there are not any ways to explain, it is because you are wrong my friend, admit it or just live hiding from the truth inside you just like 99% of the humans."
"Education is not shwoing how to thnik but asikng intreestnig Qeustoins"
"Prohibiting things is the way to increase curiosity. Curiosity increase in the most affected people by the prohibition and make build a rebelling will to try it. And it lead to a combat between both fronts.
Maybe if no prohibitions was done, the curiosity will cease and the "wrong actions" also.
If the public increase in the "wrong action". Try to find out the structural problem. Something should be lacking.
I do not to think for people but here it go (Example: Violence-> lack of union with the family or with the state (if somebody attack a state he is feeling not part of it))
Solutions to structural problems are difficult because of many and also because the politics to do these actions affect to much people and the change could not be absorbed well, but the lack of trying and the preference to hide the problem choosing easy solutions make me wonder, if the people are 99% only wanting to satisfy futile addictions that themselves created (by marketing or by not giving a real education, something that makes people think and not something that think for them)..
"
"Organization beings -1
The battle between organizations have a lot of interference in it, the states are organizations also, a different kind but in my opinion also a organization. Every organization have their rules, and it is easy to understand that the stronger organizations are the ones that appear after.
These all because the evolution in the organizations is much more like a Hill Climbing algorithm than a Genetic Algorithm. All of these because the organizations could not die and it is also difficult to keep a stable one when all the others try to emerge without destroying the stable one.
Some of what I said above is false, just because I put lot of feeling and invalidate my analisys, but the other part is observable. If you try to read this with the eyes of curiosity you will understand the precious and interesting life of the organizations. Why are we not studying these easy things in school? Maybe the science is becoming too slow in systemic views and too fast in specific views.
"
"Changes without damage is clearly not structural. Wonder if the structure still the same if there was a change at all. As an emergent system could apparently changes with the deletions of some parts of it, but will undoubtedly reorganize in the same past way if nothing in his inner rules was changed."
"I am a disposable brick, but we are the living city"
Someone asked me about Artificial Intelligence... after 4 days thinking I come to an answer:
"Well, I dont know what it is.
I can be poetic and say that "The thoughts are in the dreams dimmension and the Artificial Intelligence is their projection on reality".
I can also use my AI and guess about the essense of AI. (of course everything that my AI would guess about AI, would be a definition that an AI give to itself and thus it will be hardly recursive.)
At first thought I could say t
"Virus are the most primitive live being, they are famous for surviving under the effect of infecting another live being. But the virus could not survive whithout limitating their reproduction rate and their attacks against their host. Human beings are the most intelligent beings considered by most of the human beings, although they neither limit the rate of reproduction nor the attacks they promove on other live beings forms. Though very different from virus in structure analysis very similar to them in behaviour analysis, would human beings really break the barriers of relationship between beings and still live?"
"War is bad but explosion of Demography is worse!"
Bom, eu não sei o que é.
Eu poderia ser poético e dizer que "Os pensamentos estão na dimensão dos sonhos e a Inteligência Artificial é a sua projeção na realidade".
Eu também posso usar minha IA (Inteligência Artificial) e pensar sobre a essência da IA. (claramente tudo que minha IA pensar sobre uma IA, será uma definição sobre si própria e portanto necessariamente recursiva).
A primeira que aparece quando penso em IA é que ela não é algo que se aprende, mas algo que se esquece. Talvez isso seja somente um slogan, mas no fundo tudo que começamos a aprender sobre a IA nos restringe a nossa busca por entendimento, isso pode ser bom por nos tornar rápidos em responder algo, mas também nos torna míopes e devagar em entender o processo completo.
Tenha uma coisa na cabeça, se nós soubéssemos o que um bebê sente e pensa dentro da barriga de sua mãe, nós teríamos sistema de IA muito melhores nos dias de hoje.
Este campo é muito complicado porque ele não segue as leis de Lavousier de conservação de energia, pois quando as pessoas estão sozinhas envolvidas por silêncio, este silêncio pode-se tornar um barulho ensurdecedor em suas cabeças. Enquanto que um concerto com altos decibéis pode trazer paz.
A pergunta é "O que uma pessoa pode fazer para aprender IA então?".
Nada seria uma resposta preguiçosa e possivelmente depressiva. Mas algumas vezes ela pode ser a melhor resposta possível. Pois tem vezes que fazer algo vai apenas piorar as coisas (Por exemplo quando uma mulher está chorando e você tenta interagir com ela de forma a entender porquê).
Aja!!!! Pode ser uma boa resposta e é umas das que eu mais gosto. Porque você inicialmente tenta, se der certo você continua, e se der errado você simplesmente muda seu comportamento.
Pensar... (sim ela é uma resposta e auto explicativa).
Vou usar o dinheiro como uma recompensa para explicar porque nenhuma das respostas sozinha é a melhor:
* Se você está perdendo dinheiro então você não deve ser do tipo que pensa e certamente quer agir, mas sempre acaba não fazendo nada.
* Se você está ganhando muito dinheiro então você não deve ser do tipo que relaxa (faz nada) e certamente quer pensar, mas acaba sempre só agindo impulsivamente.
* Se você não tem dinheiro você não deve ser do tipo que age e certamente quer ficar sem fazer nada (relaxar), mas sempre acaba somente pensando.
Então minha dica é: IA é algo que você tem que tentar, que você tem que pensar e algumas vezes relaxar aprecianco ela. Ela não está escrita nos livros (porém eles são de grande ajuda), ela está muito mais cravada na sociedade, vou precisa arrancá-la. A resposta não está aqui, ela está aonde você quer que ela esteja. Porque ela está aonde você quer vê-la. Ela muito mais provavelmente está se escondendo e criando ilusões dentro de sua cabeça.
"U wanna become a genius, to understand what nobody understands... well when u become nobody will ever understand what u say, and as this phrase, the people would appear to u just like a set o garbage behavior that u would like to understand in order to show to the idiots how idiots they are... but then u find other genius that will finally understand what u mean... than u are releaved because ur brain finally had find a person to talk."
Common sluppey!
Eh mto bom ser superior, poder se impor e fazer as pessoas fazerem suas vontades... mas pra quem se delicia com tdos os lados da vida deve ter percebido q tb eh mto bom servir e dar de idiota... fazer o infazivel, tocar o inevitavel e qdo tdo tiver caindo dar risada... dizer coisas sem sentido e quem sabe essas coisas talvez facam sentido pra vida q tem um sentido irreverente q distorce qq palavra mais ou menos superior com o tempo e deixa as frases intrincadamente conectadas com contradicoes intactas... e as vezes ateh revelam um de seus sentidos...
Um bom Vorschlag (conselho) axo q naum seria um pra ser forte nem um pra naum ligar pra vida.. como a maioria das pessoas e filmes fazem, mas pra mim um bom Vorschlag seria faca akilo q vc quer e se obrigue a fazer o q naum quer, sinta os lados da vida, quebre as contradicoes q existem entre as coisas q foram adotadas pela sociedade dentro de vc... e veja o mundo com o profundo entendimento q soh o Gegenteil (contrario) dah.